From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Bannister <mark(at)injection-moldings(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Best method to display table information in predefined formats |
Date: | 2020-04-08 15:28:06 |
Message-ID: | 4864ce60-344d-12de-36a0-faee9fcdc346@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4/8/20 6:39 AM, Mark Bannister wrote:
> I am converting an application to postgresql. On feature I have is
> functions that return custom displays of a table row. For instance the
> company display function might display just the company name, or company
> name + other information. It may also call other displays, for
> instance, address or phone numbers which in turn have display
> functions. What is returned depends on context and other parameters.
> The return value is typically displayed the ui in views of the table.
> For instance a listing of purchase orders could list PO number, and use
> the company display function to list the company information. Depending
> on the display it could show just the company name or complete details
> of the company (in the context of the PO).
>
> There is also a generic function that will display per-defined default
> fields so that a custom function is not required for each table.
>
> What is the best way to reproduce this and take advantage of postgresql
> caching? These functions can be called a lot.
I am not understanding what you are after, especially this part:
"The return value is typically displayed the ui in views of the table"
Are you saying the functions are called to fill in fields in a UI form
or to populate a database side view?
>
> --
>
> Mark B
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Bannister | 2020-04-08 15:39:21 | Re: Best method to display table information in predefined formats |
Previous Message | Jimmy Thrasher | 2020-04-08 14:35:32 | Unexpected behavior sorting strings |