| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Date: | 2016-10-20 15:48:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4861.1476978513@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> One idea would be to rename pg_resetxlog to pg_resetwal. I think
> that's actually an improvement.
This would fit in as part of a general plan to s/xlog/wal/g throughout
our user-visible names and documentation. Which seems like a good idea
to me; there's no need to expose two different terms for the same thing.
(I don't feel a great need to unify the terminology in the code, though.
Just in stuff users see.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2016-10-20 15:50:57 | Re: Indirect indexes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-10-20 15:45:06 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |