From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade |
Date: | 2021-10-28 15:47:01 |
Message-ID: | 486056.1635436021@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> writes:
>> 26 окт. 2021 г., в 22:41, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> написал(а):
>> We can get around that though, by using pg_try_advisory_lock and not
>> proceeding if it fails. The attached POC does this for the 002 test;
>> it looks like the same thing could be done to 003.
> That's a neat idea. PFA patch with copy of this changes to 003.
Pushed. It'll be interesting to see if conchuela's behavior changes.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-28 15:53:26 | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |
Previous Message | David Hillman | 2021-10-28 15:33:08 | Re: BUG #17249: Bug in .pgpass search and/or documentation thereof, Ubuntu 13.4-4 |