| From: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option | 
| Date: | 2018-08-28 16:33:38 | 
| Message-ID: | 4855d0904a110970e88a662df3c768f4@xs4all.nl | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On 2018-08-28 14:14, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:50 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Imagine volatile functions being used. That can be problematic because
>> of repeated side-effects, but also will lead to plainly wrong
>> results. Consider what happens with your approach where somebody does
>> something like WHERE value < random().
>> 
> Thanks for explaining . The attach patch use tuplestore instead
> [fetch-wth-percent-v2.patch]
I had a quick look at this. Apply, compile, make check are ok.
In straightforward usage seems to work ok.
But I also ran across this crash:
create table if not exists t as
    select i from generate_series(1, 100) as f(i);
select * from t
   offset 60 rows
   fetch next 3 percent rows only
   FOR UPDATE
;
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(slot != ((void *)0))", File: "execTuples.c", 
Line: 428)
Erik Rijkers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2018-08-28 16:38:58 | Re: logical decoding: ABI break in 10.5 et al | 
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-08-28 16:06:42 | Re: Something's busted in plpgsql composite-variable handling |