From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: How to Sponsor a Feature |
Date: | 2008-06-16 00:50:17 |
Message-ID: | 4855B8C9.7040404@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of
>>> companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement
>>> features, todos and bug fixes.
>>
>> I think the professional support company listing is already that list.
>
> It is a much larger superset of that list. There's a lot of entries
> there that provide support in various ways, but not core code
> customizations. You cannot expect anyone not already involved in the
> community to have any idea which of those companies have any track
> record of getting new features implemented.
>
> Maybe all that's needed is to extend the "provides" section there with
> a tag for those who are willing to take that sort of work on.
>
>
Plus an ability to filter the list on those criteria. I'd also like to
see a space for companies to state which PostgreSQL major contributors
are working for them. That should be of some assistance to sponsors in
picking a development company to deal with.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-06-16 00:54:10 | pltcl broken on tcl8.5 ? |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-06-16 00:22:59 | Re: How to Sponsor a Feature |