From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Seth Grimes <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
Date: | 2008-06-10 18:55:17 |
Message-ID: | 484ECE15.8040601@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>> If Aster Data Systems (nCluster), Dataupia, Greenplum, or Netezza...
>
> You missed Yahoo in the list of derivatives. ...
Fujitsu has (had?) a noteworthy derivative as well. IIRC, they
bolted the front end of postgres to their ESM storage engine.
http://www.fastware.com.au/docs/FujitsuSupportedPostgreSQLWhitePaper.pdf
The fact that a large (bigger than Oracle) company like Fujitsu
supported postgres (both their own fork and the normal one as well)
was useful to me a couple times on convincing companies that Postgres
was a serious product worthy of consideration with the big vendors.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-06-10 22:03:26 | Re: POP material |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-06-10 16:01:05 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |