Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys

From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys
Date: 2008-06-05 12:23:14
Message-ID: 4847DAB2.9070701@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> Are you saying you don't like the rest of the proposal, or just don't
> like the idea of having that added as an unprotected option, but find
> the proposal acceptable?

I don't like the idea of having an unprotected option. If we were going
to have one, I wouldn't bother with the extra checks you proposed; it's
going to be unsafe anyway.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-06-05 12:56:35 Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-06-05 11:57:27 Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys