Re: Bug in plpython's Python Generators

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq(at)caraldi(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Subject: Re: Bug in plpython's Python Generators
Date: 2010-11-15 19:29:21
Message-ID: 4845.1289849361@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> writes:
> On 24/10/10 00:32, Jan Urbaski wrote:
>> On 21/10/10 20:48, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> ... and presumably somebody can fix the real bug that Jean-Baptiste hit,
>>> too.

>> AFAICS the error comes from PLy_function_handler disconnecting from SPI
>> after calling into the Python code and then going ahead and reading the
>> result from the iterator.

> Here's a patch with a fix for that bug.

Applied back to 8.2. Thanks for the patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-15 19:30:53 Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-15 19:16:06 Re: Re: Rethinking hint bits WAS: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal