Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules

From: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>
To: Justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>
Cc: Martin <mgainty(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Nikola Milutinovic <alokin1(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules
Date: 2008-05-29 17:37:17
Message-ID: 483EE9CD.3080409@Sheeky.Biz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Justin wrote:

> I'm proposing a CYA that could be used to protect all open source
> projects not just postgresql. Instead of complaining about how wrong
> the system is and the need to change it is. Use the system to
> protect the project.
>

Exactly. The real problem is that the first one to apply for a patent
gets it. It really doesn't matter who invents it. If we have patents
that cover our work then we can control who uses it and for what
purpose, also preventing others from patenting our ideas and stopping us
from using them.

Whether we handle our own patents or contribute them to another groups
collection of patents is up for debate.

Two groups heading this way that I know of -

http://www.patentcommons.org
(MS and Oracle are listed as contributors here)

http://www.openinventionnetwork.com

These seem a little similar to each other to me - the
supporters/members are basically the same with different contributors.

I am sure there was another but I can't seem to recall what it was.

--

Shane Ambler
pgSQL (at) Sheeky (dot) Biz

Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Belbin, Peter 2008-05-29 17:51:42 issue with xml functionality and <!DOCTYPE
Previous Message Gavin M. Roy 2008-05-29 17:19:11 DRDB for Standby, Failover