Re: WITH RECURSIVE patches V0.1 TODO items

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> Also I talked with him that it would be nice we could have a kind of
> distributed source repository to co-develop patches. The repository
> would be a very short life one (until the patches are committed). What
> I have in my mind is, creating a repository for that sake on pgfoundry
> or whatever place to initialy import CVS head of pgsql then give
> commit rights to those who wish to work on the patches. The committers
> in my mind currently are Yoshiyuki, I, David Fetter, Gregory Stark and
> Michael Makes (of course new volunteers are always
> welcome). Periodically (once a week or so) I incorporate diffs from
> pgsql CVS head then resolve conflicts if any.
>
> The most handy place for me to settle a CVS repository is:
>
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/
>
> I know it's a little bit miss use but...
>
> What do you think?
>
>

Tatsuo-san,

Would it not be better to use git for this purpose?

See http://git.postgresql.org

If not we can certainly create a short life pgfoundry project for you -
that seems better than abusing the pgpool CVS repo just because you have
control of it.

cheers

andrew