| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is postgresql status? |
| Date: | 2011-08-24 20:14:20 |
| Message-ID: | 4839.1314216860@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> be worked around without *too* much effort, justifies running a known
>> broken
> Anything before 8.2 is considered broken, unfixable, not going to be
> fixed as far as windows is concerned.
Actually, anything before 8.2 is out of support on all platforms now.
But running pre-alpha 8.0 on Windows is really seriously dangerous;
the list of now-known bugs in that immature port will curl your toes.
I second the advice to the OP to get off that version *now*.
8.2.some-recent-minor-release is the minimum version you should be
running if you're on Windows.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-24 20:16:58 | Re: plperlu function caused a segmentation fault |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-24 20:09:43 | Re: PL/pgSQL trigger and sequence increment |