From: | "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: max_fsm_relations |
Date: | 2009-02-27 21:06:32 |
Message-ID: | 482E80323A35A54498B8B70FF2B8798003ED1B9935@azsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ya, most of it's system stuff. OK, I see where the 1000 comes from. I bumped it up to 1200 in postgresql.conf. Is there a way I can spin that in without rebooting the DB (and kicking my user off)?
-dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Gauthier, Dave
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_relations
In response to "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>:
> There is no way I have 1000 tables/indexes. But maybe it's counting table/index file extensions in the mix? What's the metadata query to see these 1000 relations?
Are you counting tables, indexes, sequences, pg_toast tables, system tables?
SELECT relname,reltype from pg_class;
Make sure you do that query for every database and add them up.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moran | 2009-02-27 21:16:21 | Re: max_fsm_relations |
Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2009-02-27 21:00:22 | Re: max_fsm_relations |