Re: max_fsm_relations

From: "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: max_fsm_relations
Date: 2009-02-27 21:06:32
Message-ID: 482E80323A35A54498B8B70FF2B8798003ED1B9935@azsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ya, most of it's system stuff. OK, I see where the 1000 comes from. I bumped it up to 1200 in postgresql.conf. Is there a way I can spin that in without rebooting the DB (and kicking my user off)?

-dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Gauthier, Dave
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] max_fsm_relations

In response to "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>:

> There is no way I have 1000 tables/indexes. But maybe it's counting table/index file extensions in the mix? What's the metadata query to see these 1000 relations?

Are you counting tables, indexes, sequences, pg_toast tables, system tables?

SELECT relname,reltype from pg_class;

Make sure you do that query for every database and add them up.

--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2009-02-27 21:16:21 Re: max_fsm_relations
Previous Message Bill Moran 2009-02-27 21:00:22 Re: max_fsm_relations