| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays |
| Date: | 2012-03-04 20:41:37 |
| Message-ID: | 4826.1330893697@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> 1. I'm still unhappy about the loop that fills the count histogram,
>> as I noted earlier today. It at least needs a decent comment and some
>> overflow protection, and I'm not entirely convinced that it doesn't have
>> more bugs than the overflow issue.
> Attached patch is focused on fixing this. The "frac" variable overflow is
> evaded by making it int64. I hope comments is clarifying something. In
> general this loop copies behaviour of histogram constructing loop of
> compute_scalar_stats function. But instead of values array we've array of
> unique DEC and it's frequency.
OK, I reworked this a bit and committed it. Thanks.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-04 21:11:24 | Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-04 20:20:03 | Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match" |