| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: bdr download |
| Date: | 2015-08-31 19:34:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4822.1441049693@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:58:36AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
>> On 08/31/2015 09:37 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Huh, why did we decide that when the community doesn't control any of
>>> it? That doesn't make any sense.
>> It was decided during initial development because the end result is
>> that BDR will be included in core.
>>
>> At least as far as I recall.
> Yeah, I just read the thread. I guess with the low volume makes sense
> to use "general", but I figured if someone went to the work of
> developing a website for BDR, they would just as soon create a mailing
> list hosted there, but I guess not.
The opinion back then was that it would be "low volume", but the number of
bdr-related questions we see on general has really skyrocketed lately.
I think it's time that topic got its own list.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2015-08-31 22:27:45 | Re: Public facing PostgreSQL hosting ? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-08-31 19:34:17 | Re: bdr download |