| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] National community sites @ postgresql.org? |
| Date: | 2008-05-07 15:05:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4821C547.5050502@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Selena, All,
I don't think a policy is a good idea.
I think for those communities who want to operate their own sites (Fr,
DE, Br, IT, etc) we should redirect to them.* For communities who don't
want to operate their own sites (as, I guess, RU doesn't), we should
host them on postgresql.org.
Why push a policy that isn't in line with what people want/need?
--Josh
* also, how do we handle domains (IT particularly) which have more than
one site?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-05-07 15:20:28 | Re: Bolder vision of pg certification |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-05-07 15:03:20 | Re: Bolder vision of pg certification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-07 15:05:54 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-07 15:04:47 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance |