Re: 'Waiting on lock'

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> It'd be relatively painless to make that happen as part of the
>> deadlock-check timeout function, but that's typically only a one-second
>> delay not a "few seconds". I think it'd likely be overly chatty.

> Yeah, I wouldn't want one per second. Do we already track how long
> we've been waiting?

No, because we're *asleep*. You'd have to add an additional
timeout-interrupt reason. Plus there's a ton of interesting questions
about what's safe to do from an interrupt service routine.

In fact, I am scandalized to see that someone has inserted a boatload
of elog calls into CheckDeadLock since 8.2 --- that seems entirely
unsafe. [ checks revision history... ]

2007-03-03 13:46 momjian

* doc/src/sgml/config.sgml, src/backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c,
src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c, src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c,
src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample,
src/include/storage/lock.h, src/include/storage/proc.h: Add GUC
log_lock_waits to log long wait times.

Simon Riggs

Bruce, Simon, kindly fix this or revert it.

regards, tom lane