> On 26 Sep 2023, at 00:20, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:18:00AM +0900, bt23nguyent wrote:
>> -basic_archive_configured(ArchiveModuleState *state)
>> +basic_archive_configured(ArchiveModuleState *state, char **logdetail)
>
> Could we do something more like GUC_check_errdetail() instead to maintain
> backward compatibility with v16?
We'd still need something exported to call into which isn't in 16, so it
wouldn't be more than optically backwards compatible since a module written for
17 won't compile for 16, or am I missing something?
--
Daniel Gustafsson