Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Dan \"Heron\" Myers" <heron(at)xnapid(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?
Date: 2008-05-04 22:47:11
Message-ID: 481E3CEF.8000007@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Dan "Heron" Myers wrote:

>> I read somewhere on Postgres' website that the win32 binaries were
>> built with MinGW - and in fact they must be, since MSVC++ does not
>> have some of the unix headers needed to build Postgres.
>
> No, as of 8.3 they are build with MSVC.

In case it's of any help, I was able to build the test with VC++ 8 and
confirmed that it does still crash at the palloc() call even when the
exact same runtime is used by both the test DLL and by postgres.exe
(according to depends.exe).

Anyway, the birds are chirping and I have to work way too soon...

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-05-04 23:03:29 Re: Interesting comments about fsync on Linux
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2008-05-04 21:53:27 Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?