Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Gauri Kanekar" <meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1
Date: 2008-05-02 16:46:19
Message-ID: 481AFEEB.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Attempting to resend. My first attempt was rejected with this
explanation:

Your message to the pgsql-performance list has been denied
for the following reason(s):

A message was previous posted with this Message-ID
Duplicate Message-ID - <481AFC7B(dot)EE98(dot)0025(dot)0(at)wicourts(dot)gov> (Fri May 2
13:36:52 2008)
Duplicate Partial Message Checksum (Fri May 2 13:36:52 2008)


>>> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:31 AM, in message
<7e4ba9550805020031l6d20b715n8f01cd5e79147dc7(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>, "Gauri
Kanekar"
<meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Can anyone who have started using 8.3.1 list out the pros and cons.

There are bugs in the 8.3.1 release which bit us when we started using
it; however, these are fixed in the 8.3 stable branch of cvs. We are
running successfully with that. These fixes will be in 8.3.2 when it is
released.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-04/msg00168.php

It's generally a good idea to test with a new release before putting it
into production, especially a major release.

Since you asked on the performance list -- we have found performance to
be significantly better under 8.3 than earlier releases. Also, the data
takes less space on the disk, and checkpoint disk activity spikes are
reduced in 8.3.

-Kevin

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2008-05-02 16:54:14 Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2008-05-02 16:35:54 Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1