From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Gauri Kanekar" <meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1 |
Date: | 2008-05-02 16:46:19 |
Message-ID: | 481AFEEB.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Attempting to resend. My first attempt was rejected with this
explanation:
Your message to the pgsql-performance list has been denied
for the following reason(s):
A message was previous posted with this Message-ID
Duplicate Message-ID - <481AFC7B(dot)EE98(dot)0025(dot)0(at)wicourts(dot)gov> (Fri May 2
13:36:52 2008)
Duplicate Partial Message Checksum (Fri May 2 13:36:52 2008)
>>> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:31 AM, in message
<7e4ba9550805020031l6d20b715n8f01cd5e79147dc7(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>, "Gauri
Kanekar"
<meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Can anyone who have started using 8.3.1 list out the pros and cons.
There are bugs in the 8.3.1 release which bit us when we started using
it; however, these are fixed in the 8.3 stable branch of cvs. We are
running successfully with that. These fixes will be in 8.3.2 when it is
released.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-04/msg00168.php
It's generally a good idea to test with a new release before putting it
into production, especially a major release.
Since you asked on the performance list -- we have found performance to
be significantly better under 8.3 than earlier releases. Also, the data
takes less space on the disk, and checkpoint disk activity spikes are
reduced in 8.3.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2008-05-02 16:54:14 | Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1 |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2008-05-02 16:35:54 | Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1 |