Re: Protection from SQL injection

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Thomas Mueller <thomas(dot)tom(dot)mueller(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Protection from SQL injection
Date: 2008-05-01 17:09:38
Message-ID: 4819F952.1020102@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Disabling literals is still the only way to actually protect from SQL
> injection. Except Meredith's libdejector, which is even a bit better
> as far as I see, but requires more work from the developer. I don't
> count Microsoft LINQ (or Java Quaere) currently because that would
> require a complete re-write of the application.
>
>
>

I honestly don't think there's any chance of this happening, for the
many good reasons previously covered in this debate.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-01 17:25:07 Re: Protection from SQL injection
Previous Message Thomas Mueller 2008-05-01 17:00:25 Re: Protection from SQL injection