| From: | Martin Marques <martin(at)marquesminen(dot)com(dot)ar> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: meaning of default_statistics_target |
| Date: | 2008-04-28 14:49:22 |
| Message-ID: | 4815E3F2.2090508@marquesminen.com.ar |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Martin Marques <martin(at)marquesminen(dot)com(dot)ar> writes:
>> How much, and which extra statistics information will ANALYZE gather if
>> I set a higher value for one specific column (maybe one with and index,
>> and heavily used in SELECT clauses)? If instead of 100 I set a column to
>> 250, which extra data will I see in pg_statistics after an ANALYZE?
>
> The target determines the desired size of the histogram and
> most-common-values arrays. Increasing it gives you better resolution of
> those stats.
>
> Increasing the target also increases the number of rows that ANALYZE
> samples to prepare the stats, so you should theoretically get more
> accurate stats for the other columns too, even though they'll still get
> boiled down to the same array lengths as before.
Is the value measured in some scale, or does it depend on something
internal? What does 1000 mean?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-28 14:57:39 | Re: meaning of default_statistics_target |
| Previous Message | Jeff | 2008-04-28 14:48:56 | Re: status on pgiomonitor |