Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
>> D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
>>> Or, here's another way to look at it ... make it easier to modify ENUM
>>> datatypes because we all know that you will eventually need that
>>> feature whether you males, females, and unknowns think so or not.
>> +1
>
> Added to TODO:
>
> * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing enumerated data
> type
And removing values if possible (fail if values are in use?).