Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> By the way is any reason to have work_mem * 1024 "everywhere" when we have unit
>> support in GUC?
>
> Well, would you like to be able to set work_mem higher than 4GB on large
> machines?
I see, another int64 issues.
Thanks Zdenek