From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Aaron Spiteri <azzmosphere(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Numeric Functions |
Date: | 2008-04-22 13:11:45 |
Message-ID: | 480DE411.8070408@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Aaron Spiteri wrote:
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I was wandering if there where any intentions of moving some of
> the currently internal numeric function prototypes to the Numeric
> header file. I believe such functions like cmp_numerics, add_var,
> etc would come in handy when writing user defined C code.
>
> Would there be many ill effects by doing this?
>
> What should I look out for if I try it?
>
>
> <http://mycareer.com.au/?s_cid=596065%20>
Umm ... you mean like this in builtins.h?
extern Datum numeric_cmp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-04-22 13:14:20 | Re: GiST opclass and varlena |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-04-22 13:07:14 | Re: port/thread.c and pthreads |