Re: Numeric Functions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Aaron Spiteri <azzmosphere(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric Functions
Date: 2008-04-22 13:11:45
Message-ID: 480DE411.8070408@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Aaron Spiteri wrote:
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I was wandering if there where any intentions of moving some of
> the currently internal numeric function prototypes to the Numeric
> header file. I believe such functions like cmp_numerics, add_var,
> etc would come in handy when writing user defined C code.
>
> Would there be many ill effects by doing this?
>
> What should I look out for if I try it?
>
>
> <http://mycareer.com.au/?s_cid=596065%20>

Umm ... you mean like this in builtins.h?

extern Datum numeric_cmp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-04-22 13:14:20 Re: GiST opclass and varlena
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-04-22 13:07:14 Re: port/thread.c and pthreads