| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
| Date: | 2008-04-19 00:05:52 |
| Message-ID: | 48093760.8010705@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> doxygen's 200-some is clearly an order of magnitude too low, but I
>>> wonder whether Bruce's list hasn't got some false hits ...
>>>
>
> Skimming the output it does have things like "int" and "float" but presumably
> we would know if that caused any problem, they wouldn't inflate the numbers
> much.
>
>
>> 2800 does seem a bit high. My buildfarm member dungbeetle just found 2482 on a
>> build that is only missing the optional pam, bonjour and gssapi config options.
>>
>
> The numbers going to vary heavily from OS to OS so it seems to me that these
> are a basically the same order of magnitude.
>
It looks like Windows will blow all our existing numbers out of the
water. Here's a list generated from Cygwin with 6088 symbols. I'm
working on getting a similar list from MinGW.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-19 00:19:49 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-18 21:35:04 | Re: Testing pg_terminate_backend() |