Re: table as log (multiple writers and readers)

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: brian <brian(at)zijn-digital(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table as log (multiple writers and readers)
Date: 2008-04-17 01:43:05
Message-ID: 4806AB29.4080503@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

brian wrote:

> I don't mean to rely on *only* the timestamp, but for the reader to
> remember both the last ID and the timestamp for that particular
> transaction. When the next read occurs it should check to see if there's
> an earlier timestamp with a higher ID than that remembered.

[snip]

> Wait--would WRITER 1 have the higher ID?

No, it'll have a lower id in this case because it calls
nextval('sequence_name') first. Writer 1 would have a lower id, and a
lower timestamp (because its transaction began first) even if it
committed later. Using clock_timestamp() in the insert will not help,
because the first transaction to insert (as in this case) is not
necessarily the first to commit.

If a reader sees a given id and timestamp, that doesn't meant there
aren't transactions with lower ids, and lower timestamps, still
uncomitted or in the process of committing.

What you want is a timestamp that's generated at commit time with a
guarantee that no later commits will have equal or lower timestamps . As
far as I know (I'm *VERY* far from the authority here) there's no way to
achieve that, so you have to serialize your commits to the table somehow.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dragan Zubac 2008-04-17 02:57:12 Binary bytea to literal strings
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-04-16 22:54:53 Re: Master-master replication with PostgreSQL