From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq patch for pqtypes hook api and PGresult creation |
Date: | 2008-04-12 13:37:24 |
Message-ID: | 4800BB14.8050505@esilo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>
> Should the hook only be called when the conn or result was
> successfull or should the hooks be called for failed
> connections/commands as well?
>
ISTM that the hooks should be called on success and error (doesn't
include cases where a NULL conn or result is returned). I think this
makes things more useful. If the hooker (pun intended) isn't interested
in error results or conns, it can easily ignore them.
connCreate: The best solution I found was to hook into PQconnectPoll.
This required making the current PQconnectPoll a static named
connectPoll and making PQconnectPoll a wrapper to it. The wrapper just
calls connectPoll and checks the status for hook points.
resultCreate: PQgetResult seemed like the best place. I only notify the
hooks if the resultStatus is NOT copyin or copyout.
I diff'd fe-connect.c and fe-exec.c against cvs which shows these changes.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
createhooks.diff | text/plain | 11.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-12 14:04:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Terminating a backend |
Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-04-12 12:12:29 | Re: libpq patch for pqtypes hook api and PGresult creation |