| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Fredouille <daniel(dot)fredouille(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unnest multirange, returned order |
| Date: | 2023-10-04 07:20:16 |
| Message-ID: | 47e801481db9947c4a597575ad45e1c6304130ca.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:40 -0400, Daniel Fredouille wrote:
> > I'd say that the storag order is the order in which PostgreSQL stores
> > multiranges internally:
>
> Right, I believe that you are right but then this information is not useful for the developer.
> If storage order is always ascending by range order then let's make it clear,
> if order cannot be counted upon as it may evolve from postgres version to version,
> then let's make it clear as well. WDYT ?
I personally think that it is clear as it is written now.
If you have a good suggestion for an improvement, you could send it;
perhaps someone will pick it up.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-10-04 14:24:11 | Unclear guarantees about sort order on https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/queries-order.html |
| Previous Message | Daniel Fredouille | 2023-10-04 00:40:40 | Re: unnest multirange, returned order |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2023-10-04 07:34:15 | Re: Removing unneeded self joins |
| Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2023-10-04 06:55:59 | Re: Removing unneeded self joins |