From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
Date: | 2008-04-10 22:30:34 |
Message-ID: | 47FE950A.4020903@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>
>
>> And indeed the closest analogue I can think of to our habit of mailing around
>> patches is the Linux kernel where people often do post proposed patches and
>> patches get signed off by a second developer. Each maintainer keeps track on
>> his own todo list of patches to take and patches to send upstream though.
>>
>
> The difference between Linux and us is that we're so few people.
>
>
I doubt we have much to learn from the Linux kernel development process,
anyway.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-10 22:32:59 | Re: Commit fest queue |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-10 22:30:32 | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux |