Re: Commit fest queue

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Date: 2008-04-10 22:30:34
Message-ID: 47FE950A.4020903@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>
>
>> And indeed the closest analogue I can think of to our habit of mailing around
>> patches is the Linux kernel where people often do post proposed patches and
>> patches get signed off by a second developer. Each maintainer keeps track on
>> his own todo list of patches to take and patches to send upstream though.
>>
>
> The difference between Linux and us is that we're so few people.
>
>

I doubt we have much to learn from the Linux kernel development process,
anyway.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-04-10 22:32:59 Re: Commit fest queue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-10 22:30:32 Re: Index AM change proposals, redux