From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
Date: | 2008-04-08 18:49:54 |
Message-ID: | 47FBBE52.3090204@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Better support for arrays and composites is certainly something that
> people might want, but the problem with this design is that it forces
> them to buy into a number of other decisions that they don't necessarily
> want.
>
> I could see adding four functions to libpq that create and parse
> the textual representations of arrays and records.
>
>
>
Well, that was the part that interested me, so let me now speak up in
favor of better array/record support in libpq.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-04-08 18:52:01 | Re: Free Space Map data structure |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-04-08 18:44:10 | Re: Free Space Map data structure |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-04-08 18:53:23 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-08 18:42:09 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |