| From: | "Brent Wood" <b(dot)wood(at)niwa(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: IBM investing in EnterpriseDB |
| Date: | 2008-03-27 00:44:27 |
| Message-ID: | 47EBA4BB0200007B00011E66@gwia1.ham.niwa.co.nz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Add Informix to the list of IBM's RDBMS products.. Also note that where Postgres has PistGIC as an OGC compliant geodata extension, IBM already supports this in both DB2 & Informix, so an even higher degree if interoperability is there for geospatial data.
Brent Wood
>>> Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com> 27/03/08 8:20 AM >>>
Shouldn't forget IBM got DB2. Could be they are
just seeking additional userbase in opensource
market space...
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:12 -0700, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Clodoaldo wrote:
> > ...IBM is investing...What does it mean for Postgresql?
>
> One cool thing it means is that there are now *two*
> companies (thanks again Fujitsu) bigger than
> Oracle backing (to some extent) Postgres.
>
> And now one company bigger than Microsoft.
>
> Yeah, this doesn't affect the community much. But it
> sure comes in useful when your CFO calls you into a
> meeting and says "Hey, I just had lunch with
> our Microsoft rep and he asked why we're running
> some unsupported freeware database."
>
> Your CFO wouldn't want to run your company on a
> database - like Oracle 10i and MySQL and SQLServer - that
> are only backed by little (under $50B revenue) guys, would he?
>
> :-)
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John DeSoi | 2008-03-27 00:54:51 | Re: psql /usr/lib/libgcc dependency in pg 8.3 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-27 00:17:54 | Re: psql /usr/lib/libgcc dependency in pg 8.3 |