| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Date: | 2008-03-26 16:24:18 |
| Message-ID: | 47EA78B2.509@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
>
>
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>>> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>>>> Why we have pg_dump and pg_dumpall? Or I think pg_resetxlog has same
>>>> output like pg_controldata. I think we can merge these commands.
>>>
>>> Now we're into change for the sake of change? Those programs don't
>>> have any naming problem.
>>
>> yes, but they are redundant
>>
>>
>
> Really? How so? They have overlapping functionality, but neither has a
> subset of the other's functionality.
Sorry, overlapping is better word.
> Possibly we should merge them, but that's a different issue, and in
> particular has nothing to do with renaming, so it doesn't belong in this
> thread.
Ok. Agree.
Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-26 16:29:12 | Re: advancing snapshot's xmin |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-03-26 16:17:19 | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-26 16:31:38 | Re: Moving snapshot code around |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-03-26 16:17:19 | Re: Script binaries renaming |