| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdeněk Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| Date: | 2008-03-26 13:14:05 |
| Message-ID: | 47EA4C1D.8090909@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
>>> Question is also how many users really use these commands. For
>>> example vacuumdb is not too important now when we have autovacuum.
>>
>> This is not true. Plenty of apps will quite reasonably choose to
>> follow large batch updates by a single vacuumdb rather than using
>> autovacuum.
>
> Yes, up to 8.2, but I think situation for 8.3 could be different. We
> have more works, autovacuum is better and so on.
>
>
Again, this is just not true. It might not be a situation you run
across, but autovacuum does not suit all needs. This includes 8.3.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-26 13:22:50 | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Zdeněk Kotala | 2008-03-26 13:03:32 | Re: Script binaries renaming |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-26 13:25:36 | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
| Previous Message | Zdeněk Kotala | 2008-03-26 13:03:32 | Re: Script binaries renaming |