Re: Include Lists for Text Search

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Include Lists for Text Search
Date: 2008-03-10 12:24:08
Message-ID: 47D52868.2020602@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs wrote:
> As Greg mentions on another thread, not all patches are *intended* to be
> production quality by their authors. Many patches are shared for the
> purpose of eliciting general feedback. You yourself encourage a group
> development approach and specifically punish those people dropping
> completely "finished" code into the queue and expecting it to be
> committed as-is.
>

If you post a patch that is not intended to be of production quality, it
is best to mark it so explicitly. Then nobody can point fingers at you.
Also, Bruce would then know not to put it in the queue of patches
waiting for application.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2008-03-10 12:28:59 Re: Maximum statistics target
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2008-03-10 10:58:37 Re: Maximum statistics target

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-10 12:58:09 Re: tsvector prints pointer difference as int
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2008-03-10 12:16:27 Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit