From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
Date: | 2008-03-10 12:24:08 |
Message-ID: | 47D52868.2020602@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> As Greg mentions on another thread, not all patches are *intended* to be
> production quality by their authors. Many patches are shared for the
> purpose of eliciting general feedback. You yourself encourage a group
> development approach and specifically punish those people dropping
> completely "finished" code into the queue and expecting it to be
> committed as-is.
>
If you post a patch that is not intended to be of production quality, it
is best to mark it so explicitly. Then nobody can point fingers at you.
Also, Bruce would then know not to put it in the queue of patches
waiting for application.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-03-10 12:28:59 | Re: Maximum statistics target |
Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2008-03-10 10:58:37 | Re: Maximum statistics target |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 12:58:09 | Re: tsvector prints pointer difference as int |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-03-10 12:16:27 | Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit |