Re: Question about PostgreSQL's bytea compatibility with MS Access as front-end

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Kristina Yamamoto <kristinay7(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about PostgreSQL's bytea compatibility with MS Access as front-end
Date: 2008-03-05 09:02:20
Message-ID: 47CE619C.2050908@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kristina Yamamoto wrote:
>
> We decided to migrate the database to PostgreSQL, because of the
> ability to still use Access as the front-end (there are forms,
> queries, etc that are easier for the volunteers to use in Access than
> learning SQL.) We bought the DBConvert program, which stores the
> photos in bytea format in PostgreSQL. However, when we try to link to
> the PostgreSQL database using Access, the pictures are no longer
> recognized as OLE - instead they are binary and are no longer visible
> using Access' image viewer.

You can work around it by creating a temporary file and streaming the
data to it, then displaying that file on the form. That's a common
(though perhaps fiddly) option.

This site describes things, but bear in mind they're selling a plugin to
handle this problem:
http://www.ammara.com/articles/accesspictureole.html
More here too:
http://www.jamiessoftware.tk/articles/handlingimages.html

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2008-03-05 09:09:47 Re: Meaning og Logs
Previous Message Suresh Gupta VG 2008-03-05 08:47:30 Meaning og Logs