Tom Lane wrote:
> Since the performance advantages are still somewhat hypothetical,
> I think we should reach for the low-hanging fruit first. If concurrent
> pg_restore really does prove to be the best thing since sliced bread,
> *then* would be the time to start thinking about whether it's possible
> to do the same thing in less-constrained scenarios.
>
>
>
Amen. pg_restore is where all the work should be going first, I believe.
cheers
andrew