| From: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Paul Tomblin" <ptomblin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Retrieving last InsertedID : INSERT... RETURNING safe ? |
| Date: | 2008-02-20 14:26:05 |
| Message-ID: | 47BC387D.60008@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Paul Tomblin wrote:
> Be that as it may, I still don't see what you gain by doing
> insert ... (nextval('idseq'),...
> select currval('idseq');
> when you could do
> select nextval('idseq');
> insert ...(?,...
Oh, sure, there's not gain either way. Select nextval + insert works
just as well.
Theoretically, you could "pipeline" the "INSERT nextval" + "SELECT
currval" method, by sending both commands at once and only then block
and wait for response, saving one round-trip to the server. You could do
that with a batch statement, I think, or by single executeQuery("INSERT
... ; SELECT currval(...)"). But if you don't do that, there's no
difference.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2008-02-20 17:18:43 | Re: extra rowcopy in ResultSet allways needed ?. |
| Previous Message | Paul Tomblin | 2008-02-20 14:03:14 | Re: Retrieving last InsertedID : INSERT... RETURNING safe ? |