From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch review |
Date: | 2008-02-10 19:49:38 |
Message-ID: | 47AF5552.3020706@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
[...]
>> Personally I'd be happier with an editable wiki page consisting of links
>> to the original messages in the mail list archives, plus free-format
>> annotations (such as status). This should be trivial to set up and
>> reasonably flexible. With experience we might find we need something
>> fancier, but let's not overdesign our solution at the start.
>
> I will see if I can come up with a proposal on the developer wiki for a
> list that looks like that tomorrow.
I have simply converted the old "8.3 patch status" page for now by
removing all the applied and rejected patches:
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus
I'm slowly adding some more stuff from the patches_hold list there but
given the way that list is structured this is a fairly difficult and
tendious task(a lot there is only discussion/design sketches and in
effect one has to check every single mail in there to see if should be
added) :-(
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-02-11 10:13:15 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2008-02-10 11:35:13 | Patch to update libpqxx's homepage in README |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | 2008-02-11 13:04:32 | end of life for pg versions... |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2008-02-09 19:41:39 | Re: Patch review |