Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL

From: 0123 zyxw <0123zyxw(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-02-04 21:26:06
Message-ID: 47A782EE.6080100@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
>> Also, they use "period" to mean interval, and "interval" to mean
>> duration -- which is wrong, in my opinion; interval already has a well-
>> defined mathematical meaning.
>
> Agreed, but that mistake actually originates from the SQL standard. The

And plenty of other ISO standards for around the same time, such
as ISO 8601 which defines ways to specify both intervals that have
Start and End times as well as Duration Only intervals.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2008-02-04 21:31:53 Re: configurability of OOM killer
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-02-04 21:10:30 Re: Page-at-a-time Locking Considerations