Re: How do I bulk insert to a table without affecting read performance on that table?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "growse" <nabble(at)growse(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How do I bulk insert to a table without affecting read performance on that table?
Date: 2008-01-31 23:06:20
Message-ID: 47A2000C.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 7:39 AM, in message
<dcc563d10801260539r33c08e45o1932b5c6f2ac2907(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>, "Scott Marlowe"
<scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2008 5:42 AM, growse <nabble(at)growse(dot)com> wrote:
>> Scott Marlowe-2 wrote:
>> > Can you import to another table then
>> >
>> > begin;
>> > alter table realtable rename to garbage;
>> > alter table loadtable rename to realtable;
>> > commit;
>> >
>> > ?
>>
>> This is a possibility. My question on this is that would an ALTER TABLE real
>> RENAME TO garbage be faster than a DROP TABLE real?
>
> I don't know. They're both pretty fast. I'd do a test, with parallel
> contention on the table and see.

We do something similar (using DROP TABLE) on a weekly cycle.
We get occasional errors, even with the database transaction.
I wonder whether we might dodge them by using the rename, and
then dropping the old table after a brief delay.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gangadharan S.A. 2008-02-01 08:44:18 Storage space usage
Previous Message Claire McLister 2008-01-31 19:29:52 Re: JDBC/Stored procedure performance issue