From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |
Date: | 2008-01-31 01:33:20 |
Message-ID: | 47A12560.8030101@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> * Has the buildfarm script changed recently in a way that might change
> the execution PATH and thereby suck in a different version of dumpbin?
> (Or even a different version of Perl?)
>
No. In at least the case of red_bat nothing has changed for months.
> * Is it conceivable that dumpbin's output format has changed in a way
> that confuses the bit of Perl code that's parsing it? One idea that
> comes to mind is that it contains a timestamp that just got wider ---
> I remember seeing some bugs like that when the value of Unix time_t
> reached 1 billion and became 9 instead of 8 digits.
>
> Neither of these sound very plausible, but it seems the next step for
> investigation is to look closely at what's happening in gendef.pl.
>
>
>
Right. I agree that your diff makes gendef.pl the prime suspect.
Yoo also just said:
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>
>> > I can't remember the last time I logged into that box so if it's
>> > something in the buildenv, it's either caused by a Windows update,
>>
>
> Re-reading the thread ... could that last point be significant? Are
> all four of these boxen set to auto-accept updates from Redmond?
No. red_bat does not auto-accept anything.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-01-31 01:33:33 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-31 01:22:34 | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |