From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Postgres User" <postgres(dot)developer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Max array size |
Date: | 2008-06-30 20:29:41 |
Message-ID: | 4799.1214857781@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Postgres User" <postgres(dot)developer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Does anyone know the maximum number of elements allowed in a
> one-dimensional array? It looks like my script may add at least a
> couple million, not sure if it will hit a limit...
You'd hit the 1GB field size limit before you hit anything else,
at least in terms of hard limits. But the *practical* limit is likely
to be a whole lot less, especially if you are talking about a
variable-width datatype. Indexing into such a large array would
perform poorly.
I'd counsel redesigning your data representation. You'll be a lot
happier with the performance of a table with a couple million rows
than with an array with a couple million entries.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sheikh Salman Ahmed | 2008-06-30 20:37:29 | Query Fails |
Previous Message | Postgres User | 2008-06-30 20:16:43 | Max array size |