From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Selecting max(pk) is slow on empty set |
Date: | 2008-01-22 14:39:24 |
Message-ID: | 4796001C.4020804@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alexander Staubo wrote:
> On 1/22/08, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
>> Although the row-estimate still seems quite high. You might want to
>> increase it even further (maximum is 1000). If this is a common query,
>> I'd look at an index on (user,id) rather than just (user) perhaps.
>
> Actually that index (with the same statistics setting as before)
> yields slightly worse performance:
>
> # explain analyze select max(id) from user_messages where user_id = 13604;
> Total runtime: 0.128 ms
>
> Compare with the plain index on the one attribute:
>
> # explain analyze select max(id) from user_messages where user_id = 13604;
> Total runtime: 0.085 ms
Ah, but:
1. Those times are so small, I'm not sure you can reliably separate
them. Certainly not from one run.
2. For a range of different user-ids I'd expect user_id_id index to
maintain a near-constant time regardless of the number of messages for
that user.
3. You might be able to reduce your statistics on the user column and
still keep the fast plan.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-22 14:41:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Errors with run_build.pl - 8.3RC2 |
Previous Message | Alexander Staubo | 2008-01-22 14:24:27 | Re: Selecting max(pk) is slow on empty set |