| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? |
| Date: | 2008-01-21 17:36:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4794D82B.3070904@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>>> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide. Anyone know if
>>> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg? If there are fixes needed
>>> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ...
>>>
>>
>> I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl
>> tests
>> are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a
>> bunch of
>> plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests
>> passed.
>>
>>
>>
>
> For plperl, we need to test at least:
>
> * standard plperl regression tests
> * the UTF8 problem we recently fixed
>
>
First news is not good. On my test we have failed one of the regression
tests - the "use strict" processing seems to be backwards. I will try to
get to the bottom of it.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-01-21 17:38:45 | Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-21 17:31:39 | Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce |