Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce
Date: 2008-01-21 16:26:52
Message-ID: 4794C7CC.3010902@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> On 21/01/2008, Devrim GÃœNDÃœZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Orafce is about to be approved for Fedora, and I need help for one of
>>> the review items. Per:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c1
>>>
>
> AFAICT, there's nothing wrong with the Makefile. The problem is with
> the specfile, which apparently is calling plain "make install".
> It should read
>
> %install
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>
> make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install
>
> Devrim: you should be testing specfiles by building as non-root;
> you would have caught this yourself.
>
>
>

Shouldn't one always build RPMs as non-root?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-21 16:33:18 Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-21 16:17:19 Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce