| From: | Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sun acquires MySQL |
| Date: | 2008-01-21 14:01:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4794A5CD.4000109@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2008 2:47 AM, Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In other words, pl/pgsql's speed disadvantages only matter if a
> significant portion of the work is in doing things other than
> executing queries and handling the results. Certainly, these types of
> problems come up, but such cases are simply out of the scope of the
> intended purpose of the language and there are many techniques dealing
> with these problems. On the other hand, pl/pgsql is extremely easy to
> write and debug, especially when running static sql. IMO, it is an
> absolute must for any PostgreSQL DBA to master the language as well as
> be aware of its limitations.
>
> merlin
>
Perhaps it would be useful to have a page in the documentation that
provides a brief comparison between the available pl languages
(including plpgsql and sql) and gives suggestions on the best one (or
ones) for given use cases?
--
Russ.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2008-01-21 14:43:19 | Re: Views and permissions |
| Previous Message | Calum | 2008-01-21 14:00:34 | Bug (?) in JDB |