Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving

From: David Wall <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org>
To: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving
Date: 2008-01-18 23:17:44
Message-ID: 47913398.6010403@computer.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> Which is exactly why I pointed out that using pg_standby's -k switch
> was the more reliable option.

And supposedly even that switch is not needed once we can get to 8.3,
which should be soon. Even the -k switch can be an issue since you
don't really know how many you should keep around.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannes Dorbath 2008-01-18 23:40:01 Re: PHP and Postgres arrays
Previous Message Erik Jones 2008-01-18 23:04:09 Re: WARNINGs after starting backup server created with PITR