Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Date: 2008-01-18 01:37:23
Message-ID: 479002D3.9010200@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>> I agree. I remain of the opinion that this is not a problem than can be
>> solved purely within the bounds of postgres.
>>
>
> I agree. Please comment on my proposed solution.
>
>

I'm not sure tmp cleaners will work that well against a determined spoofer.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-18 01:50:40 Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-18 01:34:07 Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-18 01:50:40 Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-18 00:47:26 Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets