| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Overblogging etc |
| Date: | 2008-01-12 16:48:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4788EF76.4000309@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> Blogs
>
> I suggest we allow 1 blog per week per person and that the blogs must be
> about something constructive, not just a one liner about getting out of
Bah, this is silly. It is a blog listing. If people blog more than
others great!
> the bath or other trivial subjects. Since we have only a few blog slots
> it's a shame when long useful blogs are replaced by trivial ones.
>
Actually its not because they are blogs. If they are super important
then the information can be reposted to lists or even news/events if
relevant.
> In particular, Devrim's important info about a PostgreSQL RPM repository
> has been pushed off by 4 blogs from another community member.
>
See point above.
>
> Events
>
> ISTM that the criteria for inclusion on the Events page must be that it
> is publicly accessible and that anyone can attend, upon payment of any
> fee. I think that probably *is* the case with every event listed, but
> that should be the clear criteria: no private events and the event
> message should clearly express that.
>
I am not sure what you mean here by private event. If it is a private
event why is it being advertised?
>
> We should also have a Listings Policy that is available on the website,
> plus a link and reminder "Does this submission follow the listings
> policy?" on the event submission screens.
This is a good idea.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-01-12 16:49:34 | Re: Overblogging etc |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-12 16:29:40 | Re: Overblogging etc |