From: | Nivruth Nandigam <nivruth_n(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk" <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15286: BEFORE or AFTER not working while adding values for existing enums |
Date: | 2018-07-20 05:26:26 |
Message-ID: | 478548952.6699751.1532064386799@mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Right clicking on the source and then checking the values. Executing this query also gives me the values in order but shouldn't the enum also reflect the order when right clicked and checked?
Also, when I try to set this as a db column I see the wrong order in the drop down, the added values appear last in the drop down menu of the enum column.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Andrew Gierth<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote: >>>>> "PG" == PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
PG> I'm trying to modify an existing enum and use the BEFORE or AFTER
PG> feature to add a value in between the existing values but I'm
PG> noticing that the values are only being added to the enum in the
PG> end.
How are you looking at the order of values?
I get this:
create type e1 as enum ('foo','bar','baz');
alter type e1 add value 'quux' after 'foo';
postgres=# select * from unnest(enum_range(null::e1)) order by 1;
unnest
--------
foo
quux
bar
baz
(4 rows)
which is the expected order.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-07-20 05:48:45 | Re: BUG #15286: BEFORE or AFTER not working while adding values for existing enums |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-07-20 05:15:29 | Re: BUG #15286: BEFORE or AFTER not working while adding values for existing enums |